On 11 November 2013 17:56, Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > BTW, why did the arm/arm64 patch move from patch 1 in Marc's post to > patch 4 here? Also, the description says "this also requires a patch to > kvmtool so the generated DT matches the expectations of the guest > (posted separately)". Does this apply to QEMU as well? If so, can you > please point me to the QEMU patch? How does this patch affect guest > ABI, and is guest ABI not yet considered stable for KVM ARM? QEMU currently insists on 4 CPUs max for A15, so the question doesn't come up in that case. -- PMM _______________________________________________ kvmarm mailing list kvmarm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/cucslists/listinfo/kvmarm
