On 15 October 2013 15:58, Tom Sutcliffe <tom.sutcliffe@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Thumbs up from me testing on Arndale. My only issue is that virt and vexpress-a15 add virtio-mmio devices in the opposite order to each other, for the same set of -device command line arguments. It would avoid future headaches if we could have these behave the same. My preference would be for the virt behaviour, as the -device order matches the order in which the guest Linux kernel adds them to /dev (for virtio-blk-devices at least). Oh yes, I'd forgotten you mentioned that. Did anybody ever track down *why* the kernel is reading the device tree backwards? (PS: I'd appreciate it if you didn't drop the qemu-devel cc.) thanks -- PMM _______________________________________________ kvmarm mailing list kvmarm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/cucslists/listinfo/kvmarm
