Re: [PATCH 1/3] arm: kvm: clamp NR_VCPUS to MAX_VCPUS

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 




Am 14.09.2013 um 07:10 schrieb Andrew Jones <drjones@xxxxxxxxxx>:

> Signed-off-by: Andrew Jones <drjones@xxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> arch/arm/kvm/arm.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/arm/kvm/arm.c b/arch/arm/kvm/arm.c
> index 741f66a2edbd7..9ebf8ac3a12ff 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/kvm/arm.c
> +++ b/arch/arm/kvm/arm.c
> @@ -201,7 +201,7 @@ int kvm_dev_ioctl_check_extension(long ext)
>        r = 1;
>        break;
>    case KVM_CAP_NR_VCPUS:
> -        r = num_online_cpus();
> +        r = min(num_online_cpus(), KVM_MAX_VCPUS);

Is there any real reason to prohibit overcommit?

Alex

>        break;
>    case KVM_CAP_MAX_VCPUS:
>        r = KVM_MAX_VCPUS;
> -- 
> 1.8.1.4
> 
> _______________________________________________
> kvmarm mailing list
> kvmarm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/cucslists/listinfo/kvmarm
_______________________________________________
kvmarm mailing list
kvmarm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/cucslists/listinfo/kvmarm




[Index of Archives]     [Linux KVM]     [Spice Development]     [Libvirt]     [Libvirt Users]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux