Re: vexpress hdlcd driver: error: kvm run failed function not implemented

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi,

With the latest TC1 dts (hdlcd framebuffer and and memreserve at
0xbf000000) from arm landing team git kvm boots to console. No
graphics, I don't know how the fallback to PL111 should work?

[    1.988746] hdlcd 2b000000.hdlcd: HDLCD: unknown product id: 0x0
[    1.990585] hdlcd: probe of 2b000000.hdlcd failed with error -22

Riku

On 8 August 2013 17:19, Jon Medhurst (Tixy) <tixy@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Thu, 2013-08-08 at 14:36 +0100, Jon Medhurst (Tixy) wrote:
>> On Thu, 2013-08-08 at 14:59 +0300, Riku Voipio wrote:
>> > On 7 August 2013 20:31, Christoffer Dall <christoffer.dall@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> > > On Wed, Aug 07, 2013 at 06:53:02PM +0200, Alexander Spyridakis wrote:
>> > >> On 7 August 2013 16:51, Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> > >>
>> > >> > > I thought that vexpress-v2p-ca15-tc1.dtb was not meant to be used for a
>> > >> > > guest and that it can actually cause problems.
>> > >> >
>> > >> > It's the one I usually use in my tests... If there's a good reason
>> > >> > why we shouldn't be using it I'd be interested to know.
>> > >> >
>> > >>
>> > >> Thanks for clarifying this, I remember specifically not using
>> > >> vexpress-v2p-ca15-tc1.dtb from the arm-dts repository, back in 3.8 era and
>> > >> before.
>> > >
>> > > There was a time when this was out of sync with what the kernel
>> > > expected.  At least vexpress-v2p-ca15-tc1.dtb from the kernel tree works
>> > > for me for both TCG and KVM with QEMU.
>> >
>> > I presume with "kernel tree" you mean mainline or something derived. I
>> > see the mainline kernel doesn't have the patch below:
>> >
>> > https://git.linaro.org/gitweb?p=kernel/linux-linaro-tracking.git;a=commitdiff;h=a14098001cdcf6452f45dd9f0ade9961b94f5d6e
>> >
>> > That could explain why you can't reproduce it, if the mainline kernel
>> > doesn't initialize the hdlcd.
>> >
>> > Jon, are you sure the patch is correct?
>>
>> Errmmm....
>>
>> >  the mismatch between
>> > memreserve and framebuffer in the dtb look fishy.
>>
>> Does rather, and vexpress-v2p-ca15-tc1.dts has
>>
>>       memory@80000000 {
>>               device_type = "memory";
>>               reg = <0 0x80000000 0 0x40000000>;
>>       };
>>
>> So framebuffer = <0 0xff000000 0 0x01000000> is going to cause problems.
>> Shows how long it is since I last plugged in the TC1 CoreTile.
>>
>> TC2 has 2GB, so this probably crept in with some merge or cut'n'paste
>> foobar.
>>
>> I'll fix the patch in my tree, and dust off that TC1 :-)
>
> Real hardware works with a framebuffer at either 0xbf000000 or
> 0xff000000, I guess RAM is aliased at 0xc0000000.
>
> I'll fix this in the Linaro tree though. I assume the memblock_remove
> will fail if the address isn't in RAM leaving the top of memory subject
> to corruption when the kernel starts allocating memory already being
> used for the framebuffer.
>
> --
> Tixy
>
_______________________________________________
kvmarm mailing list
kvmarm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/cucslists/listinfo/kvmarm




[Index of Archives]     [Linux KVM]     [Spice Development]     [Libvirt]     [Libvirt Users]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux