On 28 June 2013 14:04, Andreas Färber <afaerber@xxxxxxx> wrote: > I had been looking into that tree myself, and apart from John's > Linux'ish "ARM: " prefixes rather than our usual "target-arm: " (part of > which you forgot to fix before sending a PULL), I am really opposed to > copying A15MPCore_priv for A57. I agree that just copying A15 is wrong (among other things, we should be modelling the hardware, not just "this seems to make KVM not barf"). That's one of the reasons I hadn't sent the patch set out yet. > Also I would really prefer to have the is_aarch64() helper operate on > ARMCPU rather than CPUARMState. QOM cast removal is underway to make > that more efficient. > > Is there a 32-bit aarch64 register in ARMv8 to be accessed by TCG? If > not, the field should be in ARMCPU and a bool rather than uint32_t. This also needs looking at, yes. -- PMM _______________________________________________ kvmarm mailing list kvmarm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/cucslists/listinfo/kvmarm
