Re: [PATCH] KVM: ARM: improve vgic_get_target_reg

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 04/06/13 15:48, Bob(ERC) wrote:
> 
> improve loop performance of vgic_get_target_reg and make it
> consistent with vgic_set_target_reg. In current implementation,
> vgic only sets and distributes interrupts to specific target cpu
> interface.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Bo Zhao <zhaobo@xxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
>  arch/arm/kvm/vgic.c |   11 +++++++----
>  1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/arm/kvm/vgic.c b/arch/arm/kvm/vgic.c
> index 17c5ac7..e6eb36c 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/kvm/vgic.c
> +++ b/arch/arm/kvm/vgic.c
> @@ -439,11 +439,14 @@ static u32 vgic_get_target_reg(struct kvm *kvm, int irq)
>  
>  	irq -= VGIC_NR_PRIVATE_IRQS;
>  
> -	kvm_for_each_vcpu(c, vcpu, kvm) {
> -		bmap = vgic_bitmap_get_shared_map(&dist->irq_spi_target[c]);
> -		for (i = 0; i < GICD_IRQS_PER_ITARGETSR; i++)
> -			if (test_bit(irq + i, bmap))
> +	for (i = 0; i < GICD_IRQS_PER_ITARGETSR; i++) {
> +		kvm_for_each_vcpu(c, vcpu, kvm) {
> +			bmap = vgic_bitmap_get_shared_map(&dist->irq_spi_target[c]);
> +			if (test_bit(irq + i, bmap)) {
>  				val |= 1 << (c + i * 8);
> +				break;
> +			}
> +		}
>  	}
>  
>  	return val;
> 

I'm not sure that's much of an improvement.
How about this (fully untested) patch instead:

diff --git a/virt/kvm/arm/vgic.c b/virt/kvm/arm/vgic.c
index 9f5817d..5d9cf1a 100644
--- a/virt/kvm/arm/vgic.c
+++ b/virt/kvm/arm/vgic.c
@@ -432,19 +432,13 @@ static bool handle_mmio_priority_reg(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
 static u32 vgic_get_target_reg(struct kvm *kvm, int irq)
 {
 	struct vgic_dist *dist = &kvm->arch.vgic;
-	struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu;
-	int i, c;
-	unsigned long *bmap;
+	int i;
 	u32 val = 0;
 
 	irq -= VGIC_NR_PRIVATE_IRQS;
 
-	kvm_for_each_vcpu(c, vcpu, kvm) {
-		bmap = vgic_bitmap_get_shared_map(&dist->irq_spi_target[c]);
-		for (i = 0; i < GICD_IRQS_PER_ITARGETSR; i++)
-			if (test_bit(irq + i, bmap))
-				val |= 1 << (c + i * 8);
-	}
+	for (i = 0; i < GICD_IRQS_PER_ITARGETSR; i++)
+		val |= 1 << (dist->irq_spi_cpu[irq + i] + i * 8);
 
 	return val;
 }

Cheers,

	M.
-- 
Jazz is not dead. It just smells funny...


_______________________________________________
kvmarm mailing list
kvmarm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/cucslists/listinfo/kvmarm




[Index of Archives]     [Linux KVM]     [Spice Development]     [Libvirt]     [Libvirt Users]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux