On Sat, 1 Jun 2013 12:06:24 +0200, Albert ARIBAUD <albert.u.boot@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Hi Christoffer, > > On Fri, 31 May 2013 16:50:09 -0700, Christoffer Dall > <cdall@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > On Fri, May 31, 2013 at 11:23:16AM +0200, Andre Przywara wrote: > > > On 05/31/2013 03:02 AM, Christoffer Dall wrote: > > > > This is added later in 5/6. For reviewing purposes I split the > > > patches up to do the non-secure switch only first. Later I add the > > > bits to actually go to HYP mode. > > > > The splitting of patches is fine, but it would be helpful to explain the > > scope a little more in the commit text perhaps, maybe I'm just being > > silly. > > That's the point where a cover letter will be very useful in V2. Correction: V1 has a cover letter; what I meant and should have said is, that's where an overall description in the cover letter of how commits are organized will be very useful in V2. > Also, speaking of V2 (and, presumably, later versions), that's where > patman will be useful (see tools/patman/README) as it allows one's > local branch to contain not only things like cover letter, but also > patch history, which will be a must IMO for this series. Correction: maybe/probably Andre used patman already; in this case, scratch the paragraph above. Apologies for any misunderstanding, -- Albert. _______________________________________________ kvmarm mailing list kvmarm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/cucslists/listinfo/kvmarm
