On 05/14/2013 12:42 AM, Christoffer Dall wrote: > On Mon, May 13, 2013 at 3:23 PM, Andre Przywara > <andre.przywara@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> ooks like a natural candidate, but unfortunately struct kvm_vcpu is opaque >> here, so dereferencing it does not work without further changes which I do >> not deem to be justified. I used kvm_coproc.h instead, which is loosely >> related (KVM_[SG]ET_ONE_REG) and just simply works. If you don't think >> that's appropriate, just drop me a note. Patch follows in a separate mail. > > eh, not crazy about the idea. x86 has > arch/x86/include/asm/kvm_guest.h, which may be the most appropriate, > or this could be generalized to other architectures as well and > included in include/linux/kvm_host.h. > > we can just stick it in arch/arm/kvm/arm.c for now and move later if > need be, no need to create a fuzz. Ok, would you mind to commit v2 and add the "inline" on the way? Thanks, Andre. _______________________________________________ kvmarm mailing list kvmarm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/cucslists/listinfo/kvmarm
