On 11 May 2013 17:26, Christoffer Dall <cdall@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > I just think that saying "EINVAL: Invalid argument" for a perfectly > valid argument which is just not supported on this hardware is what's > wrong, I think ENXIO or ENODEV or whatever is more appropriate of > this. That's fine with me. I don't mind as long as we document what errnos we're using and (ideally) cleanly separate the different things we're trying to report. At the moment QEMU doesn't try to do anything clever with the errno at all anyway... -- PMM _______________________________________________ kvmarm mailing list kvmarm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/cucslists/listinfo/kvmarm
