On Wed, Apr 24, 2013 at 6:46 AM, Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@xxxxxxx> wrote: > On 24/04/13 00:02, Christoffer Dall wrote: >> On Mon, Apr 08, 2013 at 05:17:31PM +0100, Marc Zyngier wrote: >>> Add fault injection capability for 32bit guests. >> >> looks ok, but seems we are duplicating some functionality here, but I >> realize it may not be that easy to share due to different define names >> for things like PSR_X_BIT... Did you look further into this? > > I did, but as you noticed, the namespaces are different. We could > probably define a set of KVM_AARCH32_* symbols, but I'm not sure it > would be any nicer though. > yeah, it's not code that's very likely to change and evolve over time, so I guess we can live with the duplication... _______________________________________________ kvmarm mailing list kvmarm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/cucslists/listinfo/kvmarm
