Re: [GIT PULL v2] KVM/ARM Minor fixes for 3.9

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, Apr 17, 2013 at 4:08 AM, Alexander Graf <agraf@xxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> On 17.04.2013, at 13:05, Christoffer Dall wrote:
>
>> On Wed, Apr 17, 2013 at 3:45 AM, Gleb Natapov <gleb@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>> Marcelo has sent pull request yesterday and Linus pulled it
>>> already. Sorry if I was not clear. Generally specking we should not wait
>>> so late into the release to send fixes to Linus, exceptions happen of
>>> course.
>>
>> I know, the reason everything got held up so late was that I had a
>> longer series of fixes that I prepared early, which the ARM guys
>> thought should be held back until -rc5, and in the end RMK merged this
>> series.  Only quite recently did I find out that these were then not
>> intended to be merged for 3.9, but rather for next.
>>
>> Any reason why we can't merge the last one-line patch now and send
>> another pull request to Linus at this point - with my apologies?
>
> Would it hurt badly if that one-liner goes into 3.9 through stable? If it makes it to 3.10-rc1, it should be basically in 3.9.1 already.
>
Since it's a very easy way for a guest to disable preemption on the
host, it's a pretty bad bug, that should be fixed, and it would really
be great if it could be fixed in 3.9, so I would strongly prefer that.
 Why is it a big deal?
_______________________________________________
kvmarm mailing list
kvmarm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/cucslists/listinfo/kvmarm




[Index of Archives]     [Linux KVM]     [Spice Development]     [Libvirt]     [Libvirt Users]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux