On 20/03/13 20:04, Christopher Covington wrote: > Hi Marc, > > On 03/13/2013 03:59 PM, Christopher Covington wrote: > > [...] > >> Alternatively, you could consider storing the host registers in a >> slimmed-down vcpu structure for hosts, rather than on the stack. I am actively implementing this (I'm turning the vfp_host pointer into a full blown CPU context). It looks promising so far, stay tuned. > One potential argument for storing the host in the same sort of vcpu structure > as the guest rather than on the hypervisor stack is that snapshot and > migration support initially intended for guests might more easily be extended > to work for hosts as well. Not sure I'm following you here. Are you thinking of snapshoting both host and guests, and migrating the whole thing? Ambitious... ;-) M. -- Jazz is not dead. It just smells funny... _______________________________________________ kvmarm mailing list kvmarm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/cucslists/listinfo/kvmarm
