Re: [RFC PATCH 6/7] ARM: KVM: introduce kvm_decode_fault

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, Feb 13, 2013 at 03:47:03PM +0000, Marc Zyngier wrote:
> Permission fault can be more than just a write fault. Execution
> fault can also occur if the page is flagged with the XN bit.
> 
> kvm_decode_fault() returns a value that indicates the fault type
> (read, write, exec).
> 
> Signed-off-by: Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@xxxxxxx>
> ---
>  arch/arm/include/asm/kvm_mmu.h | 14 ++++++++++----
>  arch/arm/kvm/mmu.c             | 10 ++++++----
>  2 files changed, 16 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/arm/include/asm/kvm_mmu.h b/arch/arm/include/asm/kvm_mmu.h
> index 970f3b5..257e2bc 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/include/asm/kvm_mmu.h
> +++ b/arch/arm/include/asm/kvm_mmu.h
> @@ -58,15 +58,21 @@ static inline void kvm_set_pte(pte_t *pte, pte_t new_pte)
>  	flush_pmd_entry(pte);
>  }
>  
> -static inline bool kvm_is_write_fault(unsigned long hsr)
> +enum kvm_fault_type {
> +	KVM_READ_FAULT,
> +	KVM_WRITE_FAULT,
> +	KVM_EXEC_FAULT,
> +};
> +
> +static inline enum kvm_fault_type kvm_decode_fault(unsigned long hsr)
>  {
>  	unsigned long hsr_ec = hsr >> HSR_EC_SHIFT;
>  	if (hsr_ec == HSR_EC_IABT)
> -		return false;
> +		return KVM_EXEC_FAULT;
>  	else if ((hsr & HSR_ISV) && !(hsr & HSR_WNR))
> -		return false;
> +		return KVM_READ_FAULT;
>  	else
> -		return true;
> +		return KVM_WRITE_FAULT;
>  }
>  
>  static inline void kvm_clean_pgd(pgd_t *pgd)
> diff --git a/arch/arm/kvm/mmu.c b/arch/arm/kvm/mmu.c
> index 633b546..58a45d1 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/kvm/mmu.c
> +++ b/arch/arm/kvm/mmu.c
> @@ -510,12 +510,13 @@ static int user_mem_abort(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, phys_addr_t fault_ipa,
>  	pte_t new_pte, *ptep;
>  	pfn_t pfn;
>  	int ret;
> -	bool write_fault, writable;
> +	bool writable;
> +	enum kvm_fault_type fault_type;
>  	unsigned long mmu_seq;
>  	struct kvm_mmu_memory_cache *memcache = &vcpu->arch.mmu_page_cache;
>  
> -	write_fault = kvm_is_write_fault(kvm_vcpu_get_hsr(vcpu));
> -	if (fault_status == FSC_PERM && !write_fault) {
> +	fault_type = kvm_decode_fault(kvm_vcpu_get_hsr(vcpu));
> +	if (fault_status == FSC_PERM && fault_type == KVM_READ_FAULT) {
>  		kvm_err("Unexpected L2 read permission error\n");
>  		return -EFAULT;
>  	}
> @@ -537,7 +538,8 @@ static int user_mem_abort(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, phys_addr_t fault_ipa,
>  	 */
>  	smp_rmb();
>  
> -	pfn = gfn_to_pfn_prot(vcpu->kvm, gfn, write_fault, &writable);
> +	pfn = gfn_to_pfn_prot(vcpu->kvm, gfn,
> +			      fault_type == KVM_WRITE_FAULT, &writable);

This comparison within the function call looks quite ugly to me, could
you use a variabled instead?

>  	if (is_error_pfn(pfn))
>  		return -EFAULT;
>  
> -- 
> 1.8.1.2
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> kvmarm mailing list
> kvmarm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/cucslists/listinfo/kvmarm
_______________________________________________
kvmarm mailing list
kvmarm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/cucslists/listinfo/kvmarm


[Index of Archives]     [Linux KVM]     [Spice Development]     [Libvirt]     [Libvirt Users]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux