Re: [PATCH v6 14/15] KVM: ARM: Power State Coordination Interface implementation

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 21 January 2013 18:08, Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@xxxxxxx> wrote:
> I still have hope for QEMU to move forward and eventually generate a DT
> based on the host capabilities.

We might improve our "modify the DT the user passed us" code, but
I don't currently anticipate "generate a DT from scratch". In
my experience using anything other that the DT which came from
the same tree as the kernel itself is just asking for the kernel
to crash with some really obscure and unhelpful error message,
so QEMU generating a DT is just going to result in a pile of
bugs on the QEMU list where users say "new kernel doesn't boot"...

-- PMM
_______________________________________________
kvmarm mailing list
kvmarm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/cucslists/listinfo/kvmarm


[Index of Archives]     [Linux KVM]     [Spice Development]     [Libvirt]     [Libvirt Users]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux