Re: KVM on ARM

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, Jan 21, 2013 at 10:39 AM, Alexander Graf <agraf@xxxxxxx> wrote:
> On 01/19/2013 05:29 PM, Christoffer Dall wrote:
>>
>> On Sat, Jan 19, 2013 at 11:20 AM, Alexander Graf<agraf@xxxxxxx>  wrote:
>>>
>>> On 19.01.2013, at 17:13, Christoffer Dall wrote:
>>>
>>>> On Sat, Jan 19, 2013 at 9:31 AM, Alexander Graf<agraf@xxxxxxx>  wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> Hey Christoffer,
>>>>>
>>>>> I'm trying to use KVM on ARM with your Arndale branch + the icache
>>>>> patch you posted recently. I am running into odd kernel oopses quite often
>>>>> though. Do any of these ring a bell?
>>>>>
>>>> Eh, not really. Arndale is quite stable for me (provided you compile
>>>> everything as ARM and not Thumb-2). Is the crash you're seeing on the
>>>> host or on the guest?
>>>
>>> These are all within the guest. The host has been completely stable for
>>> me so far.
>>>
>>>> Which icache patch do you mean? The dcache in Hyp mode?
>>>
>>> Yeah, the dcache in Hyp mode patch. I recompiled the kernel without and
>>> now I can't get the system up anymore, as it's locked in a room with lots of
>>> security measures I can't circumvent :). Monday I'll know more.
>>>
>>>> This branch should work at least:
>>>>
>>>> https://github.com/virtualopensystems/linux-kvm-arm/commits/lue_arndale-kvm-huge-vmexit
>>>
>>> Ah, I am basing off of
>>> https://github.com/columbia/linux-kvm-arm/tree/lue_arndale-kvm. I can try
>>> the other one again on monday.
>>>
>> I'll make sure my arndale branches are nicely up to date with recent
>> patch series and test things this weekend as well.
>
>
> Thanks a bunch :).
>
> Turns out this was only slightly related to KVM. I was running a guest with
> -m 1000, but the guest dtb said it had 1024 MB. So the OOPSes result from
> the kernel accessing memory from 1000-1024MB. Yay.
>
>
oh, how nice. So, on a somewhat unrelated note, if you want to play
with guests with "a lot" of memory, say around 1500 M, then you
probably want to configure your kernel as a 3/1 memory split using
high memory, as opposed to the 2/2 split which is in at least some of
the recent arm defconfigs. (Otherwise qemu will just crash miserably
on pthread_create).

-Christoffer
_______________________________________________
kvmarm mailing list
kvmarm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/cucslists/listinfo/kvmarm


[Index of Archives]     [Linux KVM]     [Spice Development]     [Libvirt]     [Libvirt Users]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux