On Mon, Dec 17, 2012 at 12:32:27AM +0000, Christoffer Dall wrote: > On Sat, Dec 1, 2012 at 7:21 PM, Christoffer Dall > <c.dall@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > Decoding the implementor and part number of the CPU id in the CPU ID > > register is needed by KVM, so we factor it out to share the code. > > > > Cc: Russell King <linux@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > Cc: Will Deacon <will.deacon@xxxxxxx> > > Signed-off-by: Christoffer Dall <c.dall@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > --- > > Changes since v5: > > - (OK, this is getting ridiculous, this time I forgot a git add): > > incorrect function declaration > > Changes since v4: > > - Properly decode XScale cpu architecture versions > > Changes since v3: > > - Only call read_cpuid_part_number once and squash warning > > Changes since v2: > > - Take implementor as argument to read_cpuid_part_number > > Changes since v1: > > - Accidentally pointed to an old file, this one has more consistent > > naming of the cpu implementor and part number defines. > > > > arch/arm/include/asm/cputype.h | 33 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > > arch/arm/kernel/perf_event_cpu.c | 34 ++++++++++++++++------------------ > > 2 files changed, 49 insertions(+), 18 deletions(-) > > any news on this one? If you resend as two patches (cputype.h first, then perf) and fix the whitespace problem in the first (missing space after '&') then I'll put them in my perf tree which will ultimately go via Russell. Will _______________________________________________ kvmarm mailing list kvmarm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/cucslists/listinfo/kvmarm
