On 23 October 2012 12:00, Jan Kiszka <jan.kiszka@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > BTW, I guess we will regret that one-reg ABI one day and have to > introduce a multi-reg version again for hot-standby, i.e. continuous > state migration. I know we also do this for c86 MSRs - that interface > has the same limitation. The multi-reg ABI idea has been floated, it would be easy enough to add. We just don't want to tie up getting ARM KVM support in with arguments over yet another ABI -- ONE_REG is sufficient for our current purposes. -- PMM _______________________________________________ kvmarm mailing list kvmarm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/cucslists/listinfo/kvmarm
