On Mon, Oct 15, 2012 at 8:02 AM, haibin wang <wanghaibin202@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > Firstly, thanks for all helps. > > I'm very interested in kvm-arm, and I plan to continue studying it in the > future. > At the same time, I hope to do something for community. > > Now, there is a doubt, I think the implements which branch > kvm-arm-v12-vgic-timers > has done are steady comparatively, so should I test branch > kvm-arm-v12-vgic-timers > code for finding bugs(i think that will be very difficult), or develop other > implements? which is better? > Is there the RoadMap to help me understanding the plan? > At this point we are trying to stabilize and optimize KVM/ARM so it can be ready for an upstream merge. You can use the kvm-arm-master branch, which will contain the latest development patches. -Christoffer _______________________________________________ kvmarm mailing list kvmarm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/cucslists/listinfo/kvmarm
