Re: VirtIO vs Emulation Netperf benchmark results

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, Oct 10, 2012 at 2:39 PM, Alexander Spyridakis
<a.spyridakis@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> For your information, with the latest developments related to VirtIO, I run
> netperf a couple of times to see the exact standing of network performance
> on the guests.
>
> The test was to run netperf -H "ip of LAN node", which tests TCP traffic for
> 10 seconds.
>
> x86 - x86:  ~96 Mbps - reference between two different computers
> ARM Host  - x86:  ~80 Mbps
> ARM Guest - x86:  ~ 2 Mbps - emulation
> ARM Guest - x86:  ~74 Mbps - VirtIO

does anyone know recent numbers for x86-based kvm using virtio?

>
> From these we conclude that:
>
> As expected x86 to x86 communication can reach the limit of the 100 Mbps
> LAN.
> The ARM board seems to not be capable of the LAN.
> Network emulation in QEMU is more than just slow (expected).
> VirtIO has a far greater performance gain than what was initially stated.
>
> Notes:
>
> Running netperf from the x86 machine to guest/host, gave slightly higher
> numbers but resulted in around the same performance ratio.
> Similar results were obtained from an nfs and initrd (whole guest in RAM)
> guest boot method.
>
> Regards.
>
> _______________________________________________
> kvmarm mailing list
> kvmarm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/cucslists/listinfo/kvmarm
_______________________________________________
kvmarm mailing list
kvmarm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/cucslists/listinfo/kvmarm


[Index of Archives]     [Linux KVM]     [Spice Development]     [Libvirt]     [Libvirt Users]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux