On Oct 8, 2012, at 9:14 AM, Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On 8 October 2012 14:10, KONRAD Frédéric <fred.konrad@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> --- a/hw/virtio.c 2012-10-08 11:12:12.211646215 +0200 >> +++ b/hw/virtio.c 2012-10-08 11:11:07.150391585 +0200 >> @@ -631,6 +631,12 @@ >> return vdev->vq[n].pa; >> } >> >> +void virtio_queue_set_num(VirtIODevice *vdev, int n, int num) >> +{ >> + vdev->vq[n].vring.num = num; >> + virtqueue_init(&vdev->vq[n]); >> +} >> + > > Hi. Can you sort out the mechanism you're using to send patch emails, > please? What you're doing at the moment seems to be losing the commit > messages. (For instance, this mail is the same as this patch: > http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel/2012-09/msg02464.html > but you've dropped the commit message/signed-off-by/authorship lines.) > > I recommend a combination of git-format-patch and git-send-email > for this: that can take a set of patches in git and send them out > as emails in the way that people generally expect to see You can also use git send-email directly or consider using stgit if you're managing a branch that rebases. It would also be really nice if you could point to a public repo where we can pull these patches. Thanks! _______________________________________________ kvmarm mailing list kvmarm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/cucslists/listinfo/kvmarm