Re: Regressions on v11

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 20/08/12 18:22, Marc Zyngier wrote:
> Guys,
> 
> I'm seeing weird regressions on v11 when running Thumb2 code:
> 
> [  315.637769] cyclictest (3319): undefined instruction: pc=0000a2f4
> [  315.637791] Code: 4640 4649 f002 fbc4 (ed95) 7b06
> [  316.216214] cyclictest (3324): undefined instruction: pc=0000a2f4
> [  316.217515] Code: 4640 4649 f002 fbc4 (ed95) 7b06
> [  325.854063] cyclictest (3444): undefined instruction: pc=0000a2f4
> [  325.854076] Code: 4640 4649 f002 fbc4 (ed95) 7b06
> 
> My previous work branch was quite solid (v10 based). Do we have a clear
> idea of what's changed in the exception handling path? Or should I
> consider doing the diff dance?
> 
> I have the ugly feeling that we're adjusting the PC in a creative way.

Fixed (patch being sent to the list). We really need a better register
allocation policy, or make sure that macro side effects are more visible.

	M.
-- 
Jazz is not dead. It just smells funny...


_______________________________________________
kvmarm mailing list
kvmarm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/cucslists/listinfo/kvmarm


[Index of Archives]     [Linux KVM]     [Spice Development]     [Libvirt]     [Libvirt Users]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux