On 12.08.2012, at 13:21, Avi Kivity <avi@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On 08/12/2012 02:03 PM, Alexander Graf wrote: >> >> Well, for now I just dropped the whole thing. In general, chances are pretty good that an HVA we get notified on with mmu notifiers is representing guest memory. And flushing a few times too often shouldn't hurt. > > That is not the case, actually. We did this optimization for x86 for > this reason. Well, it's still what it is: an optimization. I'll start worrying about it again when I have a way to search for cache entries by hva :) Alex _______________________________________________ kvmarm mailing list kvmarm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/cucslists/listinfo/kvmarm
