On 7 March 2012 03:25, Rusty Russell <rusty at rustcorp.com.au> wrote: > On Tue, 6 Mar 2012 10:53:16 +0000, Peter Maydell <peter.maydell at linaro.org> wrote: > >> (Or for this particular case just move to MANY_REGS for accessing >> the cp15 regs and then we can just ignore missing regs at runtime >> rather than having compile failures or breakage.) > > Or we could complete the structure with all known cp15 registers, as I > think we suggested we would? All 150 + ? I thought we suggested we *wouldn't* do that :-) -- PMM
