On Thu, Mar 1, 2012 at 3:19 AM, Peter Maydell <peter.maydell at linaro.org> wrote:
> On 1 March 2012 01:32, Rusty Russell <rusty at rustcorp.com.au> wrote:
>> I realise this header is a local commit, but it needs this to compile
>> since commit 1529ae1bc61a15e9a243dcbad70c95dfcdd1f0c5 (KVM: Update
>> headers (except HIOR mess)).
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty at rustcorp.com.au>
>>
>> diff --git a/linux-headers/asm-arm/kvm.h b/linux-headers/asm-arm/kvm.h
>> index ff88ca0..260c000 100644
>> --- a/linux-headers/asm-arm/kvm.h
>> +++ b/linux-headers/asm-arm/kvm.h
>> @@ -72,4 +72,6 @@ struct kvm_guest_debug_arch {
>> ?struct kvm_debug_exit_arch {
>> ?};
>>
>> +struct kvm_sync_regs {
>> +};
>> ?#endif /* __ARM_KVM_H__ */
>
> Ideally I'd like this as a kernel header commit that we can
> import, but if that's really not going to happen soon I can
> commit the local fix to qemu.
>
I can definitely try to make this happen properly over the weekend,
but I was unsure if we want to rebase Catalin's tree with LPAE support
on kvm.next, the other way around, or... I mean, there will be no good
base to apply the KVM patch series on top of afterwards, but do we in
that case simply wait for LPAE support to be upstreamed (which we may
have to wait for anyhow?)?
