On 2011-06-05 17:10, Avi Kivity wrote: > On 06/05/2011 05:58 PM, Jan Kiszka wrote: >> > >> > Note that with KVM_SET_GSI_ROUTING (bad name for ARM...) we can even >> > choose if an irq line is connected to a kernel-emulated interrupt >> > controller or to the core's irq input. >> >> Makes some sense: Add KVM_IRQ_ROUTING_CPU, and kvm_irq_routing_entry's >> union would require some struct kvm_irq_routing_cpu containing the >> target identifier. > > Right. Note it would be the default, so no need to implement > KVM_SET_GSI_ROUTING just yet. > > An additional advantage is that this is a vm ioctl, not a vcpu ioctl, so > no need to interrupt the vcpu thread in userspace in order to queue an > interrupt. Of course, it still happens in the kernel, but it's easier > for userspace to implement its device model this way. So supporting this over existing archs would have some benefits as well, though a bit smaller if in-kernel irqchip is already implemented. Jan -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 259 bytes Desc: OpenPGP digital signature Url : https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/pipermail/android-virt/attachments/20110605/64a91e8c/signature-0001.bin
