On 2/14/25 05:46, Kirill A. Shutemov wrote: >> It sounds like you're advocating for the "slow guest boot" option. >> Kirill, can you remind us how fast a guest boots to the shell for >> modestly-sized (say 256GB) memory with "accept_memory=eager" versus >> "accept_memory=lazy"? IIRC, it was a pretty remarkable difference. > I only have 128GB machine readily available and posted some number on > other thread[1]: > > On single vCPU it takes about a minute to accept 90GiB of memory. > > It improves a bit with number of vCPUs. It is 40 seconds with 4 vCPU, but > it doesn't scale past that in my setup. > > I've mentioned it before in other thread: > > [1] https://lore.kernel.org/all/ihzvi5pwn5hrn4ky2ehjqztjxoixaiaby4igmeihqfehy2vrii@tsg6j5qvmyrm Oh, wow, from that other thread, you've been trying to get this crash fix accepted since November?
