On Fri Sep 6, 2024 at 1:54 PM EEST, Philipp Rudo wrote: > Let me throw an other wild idea in the ring. Instead of implementing > a EFI runtime we could also include a eBPF version of the stub into the > images. kexec could then extract the eBPF program and let it run just > like any other eBPF program with all the pros (and cons) that come with > it. That won't be as generic as the EFI runtime, e.g. you couldn't > simply kexec any OS installer. On the other hand it would make it > easier to port UKIs et al. to non-EFI systems. What do you think? BPF would have some guarantees that are favorable such as programs always end, even faulty ones. It always has implicit "ExitBootServices". Just a remark. BR, Jarkko _______________________________________________ kexec mailing list kexec@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/kexec
