On Mon, Jun 03, 2024 at 05:24:00PM -0700, H. Peter Anvin wrote:
> Trying one more time; sorry (again) if someone receives this in duplicate.
>
> > > >
> > > > diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/relocate_kernel_64.S b/arch/x86/kernel/relocate_kernel_64.S
> > > > index 56cab1bb25f5..085eef5c3904 100644
> > > > --- a/arch/x86/kernel/relocate_kernel_64.S
> > > > +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/relocate_kernel_64.S
> > > > @@ -148,9 +148,10 @@ SYM_CODE_START_LOCAL_NOALIGN(identity_mapped)
> > > > */
> > > > movl $X86_CR4_PAE, %eax
> > > > testq $X86_CR4_LA57, %r13
> > > > - jz 1f
> > > > + jz .Lno_la57
> > > > orl $X86_CR4_LA57, %eax
> > > > -1:
> > > > +.Lno_la57:
> > > > +
> > > > movq %rax, %cr4
>
> If we are cleaning up this code... the above can simply be:
>
> andl $(X86_CR4_PAE | X86_CR4_LA54), %r13
> movq %r13, %cr4
>
> %r13 is dead afterwards, and the PAE bit *will* be set in %r13 anyway.
Yeah, with a proper comment. The testing of bits is not really needed.
Thx.
--
Regards/Gruss,
Boris.
https://people.kernel.org/tglx/notes-about-netiquette
_______________________________________________
kexec mailing list
kexec@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/kexec
