On Fri, Apr 26, 2024 at 2:53 PM Nathan Chancellor <nathan@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On Fri, Apr 26, 2024 at 09:32:52PM +0000, Justin Stitt wrote: > > Hi, > > > > On Wed, Apr 24, 2024 at 11:26:59AM -0700, Nathan Chancellor wrote: > > > On Wed, Apr 24, 2024 at 05:53:12PM +0200, Ard Biesheuvel wrote: > > > > arch/x86/purgatory/stack.S | 18 ------------------ > > > > > > This needs a small fix up to build. > > > > > > make[6]: *** No rule to make target 'arch/x86/purgatory/stack.o', needed by 'arch/x86/purgatory/purgatory.ro'. > > > > > > > I was trying to reproduce this build failure, but to no avail. I am > > curious what your build target / build command was. > > > > It is clear that stack.S has been removed so your change makes sense, I > > don't doubt that -- I just cannot get that specific error message you > > Odd, I was using my distribution configuration for the test but it is > easily reproducible with allmodconfig: > > $ make -skj"$(nproc)" ARCH=x86_64 LLVM=1 allmodconfig arch/x86/purgatory/ > make[6]: *** No rule to make target 'arch/x86/purgatory/stack.o', needed by 'arch/x86/purgatory/purgatory.ro'. > ... Agh, I was just doing a defconfig followed by a menuconfig to manually enable all the kexec and purgatory stuff. I wonder which one I missed. allyes/allmodconfig is what I needed here :thumbs_up: > > > encountered (what is a .ro file supposed to be, anyway?). > > Read only? Relocatable object? *shrug* > > Cheers, > Nathan _______________________________________________ kexec mailing list kexec@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/kexec
