Re: [PATCH v5 1/3] efi/x86: skip efi_arch_mem_reserve() in case of kexec.

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

To: Borislav Petkov <bp@xxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 1/3] efi/x86: skip efi_arch_mem_reserve() in case of kexec.
From: "Kalra, Ashish" <ashish.kalra@xxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 26 Apr 2024 10:28:41 -0500
Cc: tglx@xxxxxxxxxxxxx, mingo@xxxxxxxxxx, dave.hansen@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, x86@xxxxxxxxxx, rafael@xxxxxxxxxx, peterz@xxxxxxxxxxxxx, adrian.hunter@xxxxxxxxx, sathyanarayanan.kuppuswamy@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, jun.nakajima@xxxxxxxxx, rick.p.edgecombe@xxxxxxxxx, thomas.lendacky@xxxxxxx, michael.roth@xxxxxxx, seanjc@xxxxxxxxxx, kai.huang@xxxxxxxxx, bhe@xxxxxxxxxx, kirill.shutemov@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, bdas@xxxxxxxxxx, vkuznets@xxxxxxxxxx, dionnaglaze@xxxxxxxxxx, anisinha@xxxxxxxxxx, jroedel@xxxxxxx, ardb@xxxxxxxxxx, kexec@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-coco@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <20240426152221.GFZivGrY86svE0RZ00@fat_crate.local>
References: <cover.1712694667.git.ashish.kalra@amd.com> <cover.1713222642.git.ashish.kalra@amd.com> <a3032e4b7a5406c26aeb66e9380043c410d07e3d.1713222642.git.ashish.kalra@amd.com> <20240424144807.GEZikbp0NjFP5AM_ms@fat_crate.local> <16b34494-7e5f-4feb-8a21-58e7b8fa97e2@amd.com> <20240426142119.GEZiu4X8VPK5He4zH1@fat_crate.local> <a1d80cce-28d1-48e8-bc38-8960d8c90774@amd.com> <20240426152221.GFZivGrY86svE0RZ00@fat_crate.local>
User-agent: Mozilla Thunderbird

On 4/26/2024 10:22 AM, Borislav Petkov wrote:

On Fri, Apr 26, 2024 at 09:47:02AM -0500, Kalra, Ashish wrote:

I should have mentioned *chained* guest kexec above instead of nested guest
kexec.

What is a "chained guest kexec" now?

"Chained guest kexec" is when we are in a guest and kexec-ing into a newkernel and then this kernel kexecs into another and so on ...


Thanks, Ashish


_______________________________________________
kexec mailing list
kexec@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/kexec

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [PATCH v5 1/3] efi/x86: skip efi_arch_mem_reserve() in case of kexec.
  - From: Borislav Petkov

References:
- [PATCH v4 0/4] x86/snp: Add kexec support
  - From: Ashish Kalra
- [PATCH v5 0/3] x86/snp: Add kexec support
  - From: Ashish Kalra
- [PATCH v5 1/3] efi/x86: skip efi_arch_mem_reserve() in case of kexec.
  - From: Ashish Kalra
- Re: [PATCH v5 1/3] efi/x86: skip efi_arch_mem_reserve() in case of kexec.
  - From: Borislav Petkov
- Re: [PATCH v5 1/3] efi/x86: skip efi_arch_mem_reserve() in case of kexec.
  - From: Kalra, Ashish
- Re: [PATCH v5 1/3] efi/x86: skip efi_arch_mem_reserve() in case of kexec.
  - From: Borislav Petkov
- Re: [PATCH v5 1/3] efi/x86: skip efi_arch_mem_reserve() in case of kexec.
  - From: Kalra, Ashish
- Re: [PATCH v5 1/3] efi/x86: skip efi_arch_mem_reserve() in case of kexec.
  - From: Borislav Petkov

Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH v5 1/3] efi/x86: skip efi_arch_mem_reserve() in case of kexec.
Next by Date: Re: [PATCH v5 1/3] efi/x86: skip efi_arch_mem_reserve() in case of kexec.
Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH v5 1/3] efi/x86: skip efi_arch_mem_reserve() in case of kexec.
Next by thread: Re: [PATCH v5 1/3] efi/x86: skip efi_arch_mem_reserve() in case of kexec.
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [LM Sensors] [Linux Sound] [ALSA Users] [ALSA Devel] [Linux Audio Users] [Linux Media] [Kernel] [Gimp] [Yosemite News] [Linux Media]