On 3/29/24 3:38 PM, 'Kim Phillips' via trenchboot-devel wrote:
Hi Ross,
On 2/14/24 4:18 PM, Ross Philipson wrote:
Introduce the Secure Launch Resource Table which forms the formal
interface between the pre and post launch code.
Signed-off-by: Ross Philipson <ross.philipson@xxxxxxxxxx>
---
include/linux/slr_table.h | 270 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
1 file changed, 270 insertions(+)
create mode 100644 include/linux/slr_table.h
diff --git a/include/linux/slr_table.h b/include/linux/slr_table.h
new file mode 100644
index 000000000000..42020988233a
--- /dev/null
+++ b/include/linux/slr_table.h
@@ -0,0 +1,270 @@
+/* SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0 */
+/*
+ * Secure Launch Resource Table
+ *
+ * Copyright (c) 2023, Oracle and/or its affiliates.
+ */
+
+#ifndef _LINUX_SLR_TABLE_H
+#define _LINUX_SLR_TABLE_H
+
+/* Put this in efi.h if it becomes a standard */
+#define SLR_TABLE_GUID EFI_GUID(0x877a9b2a, 0x0385,
0x45d1, 0xa0, 0x34, 0x9d, 0xac, 0x9c, 0x9e, 0x56, 0x5f)
+
+/* SLR table header values */
+#define SLR_TABLE_MAGIC 0x4452544d
+#define SLR_TABLE_REVISION 1
+
+/* Current revisions for the policy and UEFI config */
+#define SLR_POLICY_REVISION 1
+#define SLR_UEFI_CONFIG_REVISION 1
+
+/* SLR defined architectures */
+#define SLR_INTEL_TXT 1
+#define SLR_AMD_SKINIT 2
+
+/* SLR defined bootloaders */
+#define SLR_BOOTLOADER_INVALID 0
+#define SLR_BOOTLOADER_GRUB 1
+
+/* Log formats */
+#define SLR_DRTM_TPM12_LOG 1
+#define SLR_DRTM_TPM20_LOG 2
+
+/* DRTM Policy Entry Flags */
+#define SLR_POLICY_FLAG_MEASURED 0x1
+#define SLR_POLICY_IMPLICIT_SIZE 0x2
+
+/* Array Lengths */
+#define TPM_EVENT_INFO_LENGTH 32
+#define TXT_VARIABLE_MTRRS_LENGTH 32
+
+/* Tags */
+#define SLR_ENTRY_INVALID 0x0000
+#define SLR_ENTRY_DL_INFO 0x0001
+#define SLR_ENTRY_LOG_INFO 0x0002
+#define SLR_ENTRY_ENTRY_POLICY 0x0003
+#define SLR_ENTRY_INTEL_INFO 0x0004
+#define SLR_ENTRY_AMD_INFO 0x0005
+#define SLR_ENTRY_ARM_INFO 0x0006
+#define SLR_ENTRY_UEFI_INFO 0x0007
+#define SLR_ENTRY_UEFI_CONFIG 0x0008
+#define SLR_ENTRY_END 0xffff
+
+/* Entity Types */
+#define SLR_ET_UNSPECIFIED 0x0000
+#define SLR_ET_SLRT 0x0001
+#define SLR_ET_BOOT_PARAMS 0x0002
+#define SLR_ET_SETUP_DATA 0x0003
+#define SLR_ET_CMDLINE 0x0004
+#define SLR_ET_UEFI_MEMMAP 0x0005
+#define SLR_ET_RAMDISK 0x0006
+#define SLR_ET_TXT_OS2MLE 0x0010
+#define SLR_ET_UNUSED 0xffff
+
+#ifndef __ASSEMBLY__
+
+/*
+ * Primary SLR Table Header
+ */
+struct slr_table {
+ u32 magic;
+ u16 revision;
+ u16 architecture;
+ u32 size;
+ u32 max_size;
Do these need to have their endianness specified with, e.g., __le32?
The working assumption was this would be handled by the way the pre and
post launch code was built for a given platform.
+ /* entries[] */
Instead of the above line, a legit 'entries' can be enabled using:
DECLARE_FLEX_ARRAY(struct slr_entry_hdr, entries);
I just declared these without the macro. See below...
+} __packed;
You'd have to move this above struct slr_table which would need it:
+/*
+ * Common SLRT Table Header
+ */
+struct slr_entry_hdr {
+ u16 tag;
+ u16 size;
+} __packed;
+
+/*
+ * Boot loader context
+ */
+struct slr_bl_context {
+ u16 bootloader;
+ u16 reserved;
+ u64 context;
+} __packed;
+
+/*
+ * DRTM Dynamic Launch Configuration
+ */
+struct slr_entry_dl_info {
+ struct slr_entry_hdr hdr;
+ struct slr_bl_context bl_context;
+ u64 dl_handler;
+ u64 dce_base;
+ u32 dce_size;
+ u64 dlme_entry;
+} __packed;
+
+/*
+ * TPM Log Information
+ */
+struct slr_entry_log_info {
+ struct slr_entry_hdr hdr;
+ u16 format;
+ u16 reserved;
+ u64 addr;
+ u32 size;
+} __packed;
+
+/*
+ * DRTM Measurement Policy
+ */
+struct slr_entry_policy {
+ struct slr_entry_hdr hdr;
+ u16 revision;
+ u16 nr_entries;
+ /* policy_entries[] */
... for example
struct slr_policy_entry entries[];
+} __packed;
+
+/*
+ * DRTM Measurement Entry
+ */
+struct slr_policy_entry {
+ u16 pcr;
+ u16 entity_type;
+ u16 flags;
+ u16 reserved;
+ u64 entity;
+ u64 size;
+ char evt_info[TPM_EVENT_INFO_LENGTH];
+} __packed;
+
+/*
+ * Secure Launch defined MTRR saving structures
+ */
+struct slr_txt_mtrr_pair {
+ u64 mtrr_physbase;
+ u64 mtrr_physmask;
+} __packed;
+
+struct slr_txt_mtrr_state {
+ u64 default_mem_type;
+ u64 mtrr_vcnt;
+ struct slr_txt_mtrr_pair mtrr_pair[TXT_VARIABLE_MTRRS_LENGTH];
+} __packed;
+
+/*
+ * Intel TXT Info table
+ */
+struct slr_entry_intel_info {
+ struct slr_entry_hdr hdr;
+ u64 saved_misc_enable_msr;
+ struct slr_txt_mtrr_state saved_bsp_mtrrs;
+} __packed;
+
+/*
+ * AMD SKINIT Info table
+ */
+struct slr_entry_amd_info {
+ struct slr_entry_hdr hdr;
+} __packed;
+
+/*
+ * ARM DRTM Info table
+ */
+struct slr_entry_arm_info {
+ struct slr_entry_hdr hdr;
+} __packed;
Shouldn't these three structs be added as part of their
separate per-vendor enablement patches?
They got dropped for now. They will be introduced as they are needed.
For AMD a platform specific structure would probably hold the address of
the SKL which in AMD terms is the Secure Loader Block.
+struct slr_entry_uefi_config {
+ struct slr_entry_hdr hdr;
+ u16 revision;
+ u16 nr_entries;
+ /* uefi_cfg_entries[] */
+} __packed;
+
+struct slr_uefi_cfg_entry {
+ u16 pcr;
+ u16 reserved;
+ u64 cfg; /* address or value */
+ u32 size;
+ char evt_info[TPM_EVENT_INFO_LENGTH];
+} __packed;
+
+static inline void *slr_end_of_entrys(struct slr_table *table)
+{
+ return (((void *)table) + table->size);
+}
+
+static inline struct slr_entry_hdr *
+slr_next_entry(struct slr_table *table,
+ struct slr_entry_hdr *curr)
+{
+ struct slr_entry_hdr *next = (struct slr_entry_hdr *)
+ ((u8 *)curr + curr->size);
+
+ if ((void *)next >= slr_end_of_entrys(table))
+ return NULL;
+ if (next->tag == SLR_ENTRY_END)
+ return NULL;
+
+ return next;
+}
+
+static inline struct slr_entry_hdr *
+slr_next_entry_by_tag(struct slr_table *table,
+ struct slr_entry_hdr *entry,
+ u16 tag)
+{
+ if (!entry) /* Start from the beginning */
+ entry = (struct slr_entry_hdr *)(((u8 *)table) +
sizeof(*table));
Back to the 'entries', the above line can now be made more readable:
entry = table->entries;
That's just one example, this flex array simplification can be made
in other structs in this series, too.
This one may have escaped me. I can take a look or if you want to submit
a PR, the working v9 branch is here:
https://github.com/TrenchBoot/linux/tree/linux-sl-6.7
We have a format that we use for commit messages to make rebases easier.
It was documented somewhere but I can't find it right now. It should be
obvious looking at the existing commit though.
Thank you,
Ross
Cheers,
Kim
+
+ for ( ; ; ) {
+ if (entry->tag == tag)
+ return entry;
+
+ entry = slr_next_entry(table, entry);
+ if (!entry)
+ return NULL;
+ }
+
+ return NULL;
+}
+
+static inline int
+slr_add_entry(struct slr_table *table,
+ struct slr_entry_hdr *entry)
+{
+ struct slr_entry_hdr *end;
+
+ if ((table->size + entry->size) > table->max_size)
+ return -1;
+
+ memcpy((u8 *)table + table->size - sizeof(*end), entry,
entry->size);
+ table->size += entry->size;
+
+ end = (struct slr_entry_hdr *)((u8 *)table + table->size -
sizeof(*end));
+ end->tag = SLR_ENTRY_END;
+ end->size = sizeof(*end);
+
+ return 0;
+}
+
+static inline void
+slr_init_table(struct slr_table *slrt, u16 architecture, u32 max_size)
+{
+ struct slr_entry_hdr *end;
+
+ slrt->magic = SLR_TABLE_MAGIC;
+ slrt->revision = SLR_TABLE_REVISION;
+ slrt->architecture = architecture;
+ slrt->size = sizeof(*slrt) + sizeof(*end);
+ slrt->max_size = max_size;
+ end = (struct slr_entry_hdr *)((u8 *)slrt + sizeof(*slrt));
+ end->tag = SLR_ENTRY_END;
+ end->size = sizeof(*end);
+}
+
+#endif /* !__ASSEMBLY */
+
+#endif /* _LINUX_SLR_TABLE_H */
_______________________________________________
kexec mailing list
kexec@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/kexec
