On Wed, Feb 28, 2024 at 11:08:38AM +1300, Huang, Kai wrote:
>
>
> On 28/02/2024 10:24 am, Kirill A. Shutemov wrote:
> > When MADT is parsed, print MULTIPROC_WAKEUP information:
> >
> > ACPI: MP Wakeup (version[1], mailbox[0x7fffd000], reset[0x7fffe068])
> >
> > This debug information will be very helpful during bring up.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Kirill A. Shutemov <kirill.shutemov@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > Reviewed-by: Baoquan He <bhe@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > ---
> > drivers/acpi/tables.c | 14 ++++++++++++++
> > 1 file changed, 14 insertions(+)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/acpi/tables.c b/drivers/acpi/tables.c
> > index b07f7d091d13..c59a3617bca7 100644
> > --- a/drivers/acpi/tables.c
> > +++ b/drivers/acpi/tables.c
> > @@ -198,6 +198,20 @@ void acpi_table_print_madt_entry(struct acpi_subtable_header *header)
> > }
> > break;
> > + case ACPI_MADT_TYPE_MULTIPROC_WAKEUP:
> > + {
> > + struct acpi_madt_multiproc_wakeup *p =
> > + (struct acpi_madt_multiproc_wakeup *)header;
> > + u64 reset_vector = 0;
> > +
> > + if (p->version >= ACPI_MADT_MP_WAKEUP_VERSION_V1)
> > + reset_vector = p->reset_vector;
> > +
> > + pr_debug("MP Wakeup (version[%d], mailbox[%#llx], reset[%#llx])\n",
> > + p->version, p->mailbox_address, reset_vector);
> > + }
> > + break;
> > +
>
> Hmm.. I hate to say, but maybe it is better to put this patch at some early
> place in this series w/o mailbox version and reset_vector, and add
> incremental changes where mailbox/reset_vector is introduced in this series.
>
> The advantage is in this way someone can just backport this patch to the old
> kernel if they care -- this should be part of commit f39642d0dbacd
> ("x86/acpi/x86/boot: Add multiprocessor wake-up support") anyway.
It is not subject for backporting. It is just a cosmetics fix (or debug
facility). Any new MADT type would generate a warning. Nothing wrong with
it.
--
Kiryl Shutsemau / Kirill A. Shutemov
_______________________________________________
kexec mailing list
kexec@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/kexec
