On Mon, Feb 19, 2024 at 12:45:31PM +0800, Baoquan He wrote:
> Do we need add the entry printing for ACPI_MADT_TYPE_MULTIPROC_WAKEUP
> now in acpi_table_print_madt_entry()? Surely it's not related to this
> patch.
Good catch. See patch below. Does it look okay?
> FWIW,
>
> Reviewed-by: Baoquan He <bhe@xxxxxxxxxx>
Thanks!
>From 23b7f9856a3d6b91c702def1e03872a60ae07d0e Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: "Kirill A. Shutemov" <kirill.shutemov@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 19 Feb 2024 11:58:19 +0200
Subject: [PATCH] ACPI: tables: Print MULTIPROC_WAKEUP when MADT is parse
When MADT is parsed, print MULTIPROC_WAKEUP information:
ACPI: MP Wakeup (version[1], mailbox[0x7fffd000], reset[0x7fffe068])
This debug information will be very helpful during bring up.
Signed-off-by: Kirill A. Shutemov <kirill.shutemov@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
drivers/acpi/tables.c | 14 ++++++++++++++
1 file changed, 14 insertions(+)
diff --git a/drivers/acpi/tables.c b/drivers/acpi/tables.c
index b07f7d091d13..c59a3617bca7 100644
--- a/drivers/acpi/tables.c
+++ b/drivers/acpi/tables.c
@@ -198,6 +198,20 @@ void acpi_table_print_madt_entry(struct acpi_subtable_header *header)
}
break;
+ case ACPI_MADT_TYPE_MULTIPROC_WAKEUP:
+ {
+ struct acpi_madt_multiproc_wakeup *p =
+ (struct acpi_madt_multiproc_wakeup *)header;
+ u64 reset_vector = 0;
+
+ if (p->version >= ACPI_MADT_MP_WAKEUP_VERSION_V1)
+ reset_vector = p->reset_vector;
+
+ pr_debug("MP Wakeup (version[%d], mailbox[%#llx], reset[%#llx])\n",
+ p->version, p->mailbox_address, reset_vector);
+ }
+ break;
+
case ACPI_MADT_TYPE_CORE_PIC:
{
struct acpi_madt_core_pic *p = (struct acpi_madt_core_pic *)header;
--
2.43.0
--
Kiryl Shutsemau / Kirill A. Shutemov
_______________________________________________
kexec mailing list
kexec@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/kexec
