Hi Tushar, > > This patch moves the ima_dump_measurement_list() call from kexec load > > to exec, but doesn't register the reboot notifier in this patch. I > > don't see how it is possible with just the previous and this patch > > applied that the measurement list is carried across kexec. > Ah. That's a good catch. > I was only checking if I can boot into the Kernel for testing > bisect-safe readiness for each patch. I will ensure the move of > ima_dump_measurement_list() and registering the reboot notifier at > execute stays an atomic operation in a single patch. Thanks! > >> diff --git a/kernel/kexec_file.c b/kernel/kexec_file.c > >> index f989f5f1933b..bf758fd5062c 100644 > >> --- a/kernel/kexec_file.c > >> +++ b/kernel/kexec_file.c > >> @@ -734,6 +734,14 @@ static int kexec_calculate_store_digests(struct kimage *image) > >> if (ksegment->kbuf == pi->purgatory_buf) > >> continue; > >> > >> + /* > >> + * Skip the segment if ima_segment_index is set and matches > >> + * the current index > >> + */ > >> + if (image->is_ima_segment_index_set && > >> + i == image->ima_segment_index) > >> + continue; > > > > With this change, the IMA segment is not included in the digest > > calculation, nor should it be included in the digest verification. > > However, I'm not seeing the matching code change in the digest > > verification. > > > Fair question. > > But I don't think anything else needs to be done here. > > The way kexec_calculate_store_digests() and verify_sha256_digest() > are implemented, it already skips verification of the segments if > the segment is not part of 'purgatory_sha_regions'. > > In kexec_calculate_store_digests(), my change is to 'continue' when the > segment is the IMA segment when the function is going through all the > segments in a for loop [1]. > > Therefore in kexec_calculate_store_digests() - > - crypto_shash_update() is not called for IMA segment [1]. > - sha_regions[j] is not updated with IMA segment [1]. > - This 'sha_regions' variable later becomes 'purgatory_sha_regions' > in kexec_calculate_store_digests [1]. > - and verify_sha256_digest() only verifies 'purgatory_sha_regions'[2]. > > Since IMA segment is not part of the 'purgatory_sha_regions', it is > not included in the verification as part of verify_sha256_digest(). > > > Please make ignoring the IMA segment a separate patch. > > > Sure. Will do. Thank you for the explanation. Please include in the patch description a statement about the "sha_regions" not including the IMA segment, so nothing is needed on the verify side. > > >> ret = crypto_shash_update(desc, ksegment->kbuf, > >> ksegment->bufsz); > >> if (ret) > ... > ... > ... > >> diff --git a/security/integrity/ima/ima.h b/security/integrity/ima/ima.h > >> index c29db699c996..49a6047dd8eb 100644 > > > > Suspending and resuming extending the measurement list should be a > > separate patch as well, with its own patch description. > > > Sure. Will do. Thanks! Mimi _______________________________________________ kexec mailing list kexec@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/kexec
