On 12/25/23 at 09:44pm, fuqiang wang wrote: > 在 2023/12/24 12:46, Baoquan He 写道: > > > Rethink about this, seems above code comment is fine to be kept, and the > > same feeling about the elfheader region split from crashk_res. So, other > > than the patch log concerns, this patch looks good to me. Let's see if > > other people has concern about the newly added comments. > > > > Hi Baoquan > > Thank you very much for your suggestions in the patch log and code comments. I > have learned a lot and I will gradually improve. > > I found the following patch in linux-next: > https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/next/linux-next.git/commit/?id=666ef13f2870c43ba8a402ec8a3cedf6eb6c6f5a > > I'm sorry, It's my mistake. Do you think it is still necessary to merge this > patch based on that ? That patch need be withdrew because that is not expected according to our discussion. Hi Andrew, Could you withdraw the patch fuqiang mentioned? x86/crash: fix potential cmem->ranges array overflow https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/next/linux-next.git/commit/?id=666ef13f2870c43ba8a402ec8a3cedf6eb6c6f5a Thanks _______________________________________________ kexec mailing list kexec@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/kexec
