On Fri, 2023-12-22 at 14:19 +0300, kirill.shutemov@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 05, 2023 at 11:36:55PM +0000, Huang, Kai wrote:
> >
> > > +
> > > +static void acpi_mp_stop_other_cpus(int wait)
> > > +{
> > > + smp_shutdown_nonboot_cpus(smp_processor_id());
> > > +}
> >
> > Is this and ...
> >
> > + smp_ops.stop_other_cpus = acpi_mp_stop_other_cpus;
> >
> > ... this below still needed?
> >
> > I think the current native_stop_other_cpus() should just work given you have set
> > up ...
> >
> > + smp_ops.crash_play_dead = crash_acpi_mp_play_dead;
> >
> > ... for TDX guest?
>
> To make it work stop_this_cpu() would need to be modified to use
> smp_ops.crash_play_dead() instead of native_halt(). But name of the
> callback doesn't match the function, so I renamed it to
> smp_ops.stop_this_cpu().
Seems reasonable to me. Thanks.
_______________________________________________
kexec mailing list
kexec@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/kexec
