Hi Alexander, kernel test robot noticed the following build warnings: [auto build test WARNING on tip/x86/core] [also build test WARNING on arm64/for-next/core akpm-mm/mm-everything linus/master v6.7-rc5 next-20231213] [If your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, kindly drop us a note. And when submitting patch, we suggest to use '--base' as documented in https://git-scm.com/docs/git-format-patch#_base_tree_information] url: https://github.com/intel-lab-lkp/linux/commits/Alexander-Graf/mm-memblock-Add-support-for-scratch-memory/20231213-080941 base: tip/x86/core patch link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20231213000452.88295-7-graf%40amazon.com patch subject: [PATCH 06/15] arm64: Add KHO support config: microblaze-randconfig-r133-20231213 (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20231213/202312132139.g2NKV67G-lkp@xxxxxxxxx/config) compiler: microblaze-linux-gcc (GCC) 13.2.0 reproduce: (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20231213/202312132139.g2NKV67G-lkp@xxxxxxxxx/reproduce) If you fix the issue in a separate patch/commit (i.e. not just a new version of the same patch/commit), kindly add following tags | Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@xxxxxxxxx> | Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202312132139.g2NKV67G-lkp@xxxxxxxxx/ sparse warnings: (new ones prefixed by >>) >> drivers/of/fdt.c:1012:13: sparse: sparse: symbol 'early_init_dt_check_kho' was not declared. Should it be static? vim +/early_init_dt_check_kho +1012 drivers/of/fdt.c 1008 1009 /** 1010 * early_init_dt_check_kho - Decode info required for kexec handover from DT 1011 */ > 1012 void __init early_init_dt_check_kho(void) 1013 { 1014 #ifdef CONFIG_KEXEC_KHO 1015 unsigned long node = chosen_node_offset; 1016 u64 kho_start, scratch_start, scratch_size, mem_start, mem_size; 1017 const __be32 *p; 1018 int l; 1019 1020 if ((long)node < 0) 1021 return; 1022 1023 p = of_get_flat_dt_prop(node, "linux,kho-dt", &l); 1024 if (l != (dt_root_addr_cells + dt_root_size_cells) * sizeof(__be32)) 1025 return; 1026 1027 kho_start = dt_mem_next_cell(dt_root_addr_cells, &p); 1028 1029 p = of_get_flat_dt_prop(node, "linux,kho-scratch", &l); 1030 if (l != (dt_root_addr_cells + dt_root_size_cells) * sizeof(__be32)) 1031 return; 1032 1033 scratch_start = dt_mem_next_cell(dt_root_addr_cells, &p); 1034 scratch_size = dt_mem_next_cell(dt_root_addr_cells, &p); 1035 1036 p = of_get_flat_dt_prop(node, "linux,kho-mem", &l); 1037 if (l != (dt_root_addr_cells + dt_root_size_cells) * sizeof(__be32)) 1038 return; 1039 1040 mem_start = dt_mem_next_cell(dt_root_addr_cells, &p); 1041 mem_size = dt_mem_next_cell(dt_root_addr_cells, &p); 1042 1043 kho_populate(kho_start, scratch_start, scratch_size, mem_start, mem_size); 1044 #endif 1045 } 1046 -- 0-DAY CI Kernel Test Service https://github.com/intel/lkp-tests/wiki _______________________________________________ kexec mailing list kexec@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/kexec
