On Tue, Nov 21, 2023 at 12:42:20PM +0300, kirill.shutemov@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote: > > That being said, I think perhaps you can separate the /sysfs part as a separate > > patch because it's not a mandatory part of this series but a nice to have. Then > > the /sysfs part can be reviewed separately. > > Okay, makes sense. Hm. Without debugfs there's nothing really left in the patch. Accounting itself is few lines. I will probably leave it as is. -- Kiryl Shutsemau / Kirill A. Shutemov _______________________________________________ kexec mailing list kexec@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/kexec