Re: [RFC V2] IMA Log Snapshotting Design Proposal

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 





On 11/13/2023 10:59 AM, Stefan Berger wrote:


On 10/19/23 14:49, Tushar Sugandhi wrote:
=======================================================================
| Introduction |
=======================================================================
This document provides a detailed overview of the proposed Kernel
feature IMA log snapshotting.  It describes the motivation behind the
proposal, the problem to be solved, a detailed solution design with
examples, and describes the changes to be made in the clients/services
which are part of remote-attestation system.  This is the 2nd version
of the proposal.  The first version is present here[1].

Table of Contents:
------------------
A. Motivation and Background
B. Goals and Non-Goals
     B.1 Goals
     B.2 Non-Goals
C. Proposed Solution
     C.1 Solution Summary
     C.2 High-level Work-flow
D. Detailed Design
     D.1 Snapshot Aggregate Event
     D.2 Snapshot Triggering Mechanism
     D.3 Choosing A Persistent Storage Location For Snapshots
     D.4 Remote-Attestation Client/Service-side Changes
         D.4.a Client-side Changes
         D.4.b Service-side Changes
E. Example Walk-through
F. Other Design Considerations
G. References


Userspace applications will have to know
a) where are the shard files?
We describe the file storage location choices in section D.3, but user
applications will have to query the well-known location described there.
b) how do I read the shard files while locking out the producer of the shard files?

IMO, this will require a well known config file and a locking method (flock) so that user space applications can work together in this new environment. The lock could be defined in the config file or just be the config file itself.
The flock is a good idea for co-ordination between UM clients. While
the Kernel cannot enforce any access in this way, any UM process that
is planning on triggering the snapshot mechanism should follow that
protocol.  We will ensure we document that as the best-practices in
the patch series.
- Sush

_______________________________________________
kexec mailing list
kexec@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/kexec




[Index of Archives]     [LM Sensors]     [Linux Sound]     [ALSA Users]     [ALSA Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Linux Media]     [Kernel]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Media]

  Powered by Linux