On Mon, Sep 11, 2023 at 11:50:31AM +0200, David Hildenbrand wrote:
> On 11.09.23 11:27, Kirill A. Shutemov wrote:
> > On Mon, Sep 11, 2023 at 10:42:51AM +0200, David Hildenbrand wrote:
> > > On 11.09.23 10:41, Kirill A. Shutemov wrote:
> > > > On Mon, Sep 11, 2023 at 10:03:36AM +0200, David Hildenbrand wrote:
> > > > > On 06.09.23 09:39, Adrian Hunter wrote:
> > > > > > Support for unaccepted memory was added recently, refer commit
> > > > > > dcdfdd40fa82 ("mm: Add support for unaccepted memory"), whereby
> > > > > > a virtual machine may need to accept memory before it can be used.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Do not map unaccepted memory because it can cause the guest to fail.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > For /proc/vmcore, which is read-only, this means a read or mmap of
> > > > > > unaccepted memory will return zeros.
> > > > >
> > > > > Does a second (kdump) kernel that exposes /proc/vmcore reliably get access
> > > > > to the information whether memory of the first kernel is unaccepted (IOW,
> > > > > not its memory, but the memory of the first kernel it is supposed to expose
> > > > > via /proc/vmcore)?
> > > >
> > > > There are few patches in my queue to few related issue, but generally,
> > > > yes, the information is available to the target kernel via EFI
> > > > configuration table.
> > >
> > > I assume that table provided by the first kernel, and not read directly from
> > > HW, correct?
> >
> > The table is constructed by the EFI stub in the first kernel based on EFI
> > memory map.
> >
>
> Okay, should work then once that's done by the first kernel.
>
> Maybe include this patch in your series?
Can do. But the other two patches are not related to kexec. Hm.
--
Kiryl Shutsemau / Kirill A. Shutemov
_______________________________________________
kexec mailing list
kexec@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/kexec
