Re: [RFC] IMA Log Snapshotting Design Proposal - network bandwidth

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 





On 8/1/2023 3:12 PM, Sush Shringarputale wrote:
In addition, a large IMA log can add pressure on the network bandwidth when
the attestation client sends it to remote-attestation-service.

I would not worry too much about network bandwidth.

1. Every solution eventually realizes that sending the entire log each time hurts performance. The verifier will ask the attestor, "give me everything since record n", and the number of new entries approaches zero.

2. My benchmarks show that

On the client, the TPM quote time swamps everything else.
On the server, verifying the IMA entry signatures swamps everything else.

The network transfer time is negligible.

_______________________________________________
kexec mailing list
kexec@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/kexec



[Index of Archives]     [LM Sensors]     [Linux Sound]     [ALSA Users]     [ALSA Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Linux Media]     [Kernel]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Media]

  Powered by Linux