Re: [Crash-utility] RISCV64: Use va_kernel_pa_offset in VTOP()

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi Song,


On 24/07/2023 06:06, Song Shuai wrote:
Since RISC-V Linux v6.4, the commit 3335068f8721 ("riscv: Use
PUD/P4D/PGD pages for the linear mapping") changes the
phys_ram_base from the kernel_map.phys_addr to the start of DRAM.


Maybe we could be more explicit here, kernel_map.phys_addr actually points to the physical start of the kernel so maybe something like that:

"changes phys_ram_base from the physical start of the kernel to the actual start of the DRAM."



The Crash's VTOP() still uses phys_ram_base and kernel_map.virt_addr
to translate kernel virtual address, that made Crash boot failed with
Linux v6.4 and later version.

Let Linux export kernel_map.va_kernel_pa_offset in v6.5 and Crash can
use "va_kernel_pa_offset" to translate the kernel virtual address in
VTOP() correctly.

Signed-off-by: Song Shuai <suagrfillet@xxxxxxxxx>
---
You can check/test the Linux changes from this link:
https://github.com/sugarfillet/linux/commits/6.5-rc3-crash

And I'll send the Linux changes to riscv/for-next If you're ok with this patch.
---
  defs.h    |  4 ++--
  riscv64.c | 22 ++++++++++++++++++++++
  2 files changed, 24 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/defs.h b/defs.h
index 358f365..46b9857 100644
--- a/defs.h
+++ b/defs.h
@@ -3662,8 +3662,7 @@ typedef signed int s32;
  	ulong _X = X;									\
  	(THIS_KERNEL_VERSION >= LINUX(5,13,0) &&					\
  		(_X) >= machdep->machspec->kernel_link_addr) ?				\
-		(((unsigned long)(_X)-(machdep->machspec->kernel_link_addr)) +		\
-		 machdep->machspec->phys_base):						\
+		((unsigned long)(_X)-(machdep->machspec->va_kernel_pa_offset)): 	\
  		(((unsigned long)(_X)-(machdep->kvbase)) +				\
  		 machdep->machspec->phys_base);						\
  	})
@@ -7021,6 +7020,7 @@ struct machine_specific {
  	ulong modules_vaddr;
  	ulong modules_end;
  	ulong kernel_link_addr;
+	ulong va_kernel_pa_offset;
ulong _page_present;
  	ulong _page_read;
diff --git a/riscv64.c b/riscv64.c
index 6b9a688..b9e50b4 100644
--- a/riscv64.c
+++ b/riscv64.c
@@ -418,6 +418,27 @@ error:
  	error(FATAL, "cannot get vm layout\n");
  }
+static void
+riscv64_get_va_kernel_pa_offset(struct machine_specific *ms)
+{
+	unsigned long kernel_version = riscv64_get_kernel_version();
+
+	/*
+	 * va_kernel_pa_offset is defined in Linux kernel since 6.5.
+	 */
+	if (kernel_version >= LINUX(6,5,0)) {
+		char *string;
+		if ((string = pc->read_vmcoreinfo("NUMBER(va_kernel_pa_offset)"))) {
+			ms->va_kernel_pa_offset = htol(string, QUIET, NULL);
+			free(string);
+		} else
+			error(FATAL, "cannot read va_kernel_pa_offset\n");
+	} else if (kernel_version >= LINUX(6,4,0))
+		error(FATAL, "cannot determine va_kernel_pa_offset since Linux 6.4\n");
+	else
+		ms->va_kernel_pa_offset = ms->kernel_link_addr - ms->phys_base;
+}
+
  static int
  riscv64_is_kvaddr(ulong vaddr)
  {
@@ -1352,6 +1373,7 @@ riscv64_init(int when)
  		riscv64_get_struct_page_size(machdep->machspec);
  		riscv64_get_va_bits(machdep->machspec);
  		riscv64_get_va_range(machdep->machspec);
+		riscv64_get_va_kernel_pa_offset(machdep->machspec);
pt_level_alloc(&machdep->pgd, "cannot malloc pgd space.");
  		pt_level_alloc(&machdep->machspec->p4d, "cannot malloc p4d space.");


Would you mind giving me the instructions on how to reproduce the issue please? So that I can add that to our internal CI and avoid this type of breakage in the future.

Thanks,

Alex


_______________________________________________
kexec mailing list
kexec@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/kexec



[Index of Archives]     [LM Sensors]     [Linux Sound]     [ALSA Users]     [ALSA Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Linux Media]     [Kernel]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Media]

  Powered by Linux