On Thu May 25, 2023 at 1:56 AM EEST, Jerry Snitselaar wrote: > On Tue, Apr 18, 2023 at 09:44:07AM -0400, Stefan Berger wrote: > > Simplify tpm_read_log_of() by moving reusable parts of the code into > > an inline function that makes it commonly available so it can be > > used also for kexec support. Call the new of_tpm_get_sml_parameters() > > function from the TPM Open Firmware driver. > > > > Signed-off-by: Stefan Berger <stefanb@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > Cc: Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko@xxxxxxxxxx> > > Cc: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@xxxxxxxx> > > Cc: Rob Herring <robh+dt@xxxxxxxxxx> > > Cc: Frank Rowand <frowand.list@xxxxxxxxx> > > Reviewed-by: Mimi Zohar <zohar@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > Tested-by: Nageswara R Sastry <rnsastry@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > Tested-by: Coiby Xu <coxu@xxxxxxxxxx> > > Acked-by: Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko@xxxxxxxxxx> > > > > Reviewed-by: Jerry Snitselaar <jsnitsel@xxxxxxxxxx> If I just pick tpm only patches they won't apply so maybe TPM changes should be better separated if that is by any means possible. Open for counter proposals. Just my thoughts... I.e. I'm mainly wondering why TPM patches depend on IMA patches? BR, Jarkko _______________________________________________ kexec mailing list kexec@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/kexec
