On Sun, May 07, 2023 at 06:17:17PM -0700, Luis Chamberlain wrote:
> Add support to automatically handle freezing and thawing filesystems
> during the kernel's suspend/resume cycle.
>
> This is needed so that we properly really stop IO in flight without
> races after userspace has been frozen. Without this we rely on
> kthread freezing and its semantics are loose and error prone.
> For instance, even though a kthread may use try_to_freeze() and end
> up being frozen we have no way of being sure that everything that
> has been spawned asynchronously from it (such as timers) have also
> been stopped as well.
>
> A long term advantage of also adding filesystem freeze / thawing
> supporting during suspend / hibernation is that long term we may
> be able to eventually drop the kernel's thread freezing completely
> as it was originally added to stop disk IO in flight as we hibernate
> or suspend.
>
> This does not remove the superfluous freezer calls on all filesystems.
> Each filesystem must remove all the kthread freezer stuff and peg
> the fs_type flags as supporting auto-freezing with the FS_AUTOFREEZE
> flag.
>
> Subsequent patches remove the kthread freezer usage from each
> filesystem, one at a time to make all this work bisectable.
> Once all filesystems remove the usage of the kthread freezer we
> can remove the FS_AUTOFREEZE flag.
>
> Reviewed-by: Jan Kara <jack@xxxxxxx>
> Signed-off-by: Luis Chamberlain <mcgrof@xxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> fs/super.c | 50 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> include/linux/fs.h | 14 ++++++++++++
> kernel/power/process.c | 15 ++++++++++++-
> 3 files changed, 78 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
.....
> diff --git a/kernel/power/process.c b/kernel/power/process.c
> index cae81a87cc91..7ca7688f0b5d 100644
> --- a/kernel/power/process.c
> +++ b/kernel/power/process.c
> @@ -140,6 +140,16 @@ int freeze_processes(void)
>
> BUG_ON(in_atomic());
>
> + pr_info("Freezing filesystems ... ");
> + error = iterate_supers_reverse_excl(fs_suspend_freeze_sb, NULL);
> + if (error) {
> + pr_cont("failed\n");
> + iterate_supers_excl(fs_suspend_thaw_sb, NULL);
> + thaw_processes();
> + return error;
That looks wrong. i.e. if the sb iteration fails to freeze a
filesystem (for whatever reason) then every userspace frozen
filesystem will be thawed by this call, right? i.e. it will thaw
more than just the filesystems frozen by the suspend freeze
iteration before it failed.
Don't we only want to thaw the superblocks we froze before the
failure occurred? i.e. the "undo" iteration needs to start from the
last superblock we successfully froze and then only walk to the tail
of the list we started from?
> + }
> + pr_cont("done.\n");
> +
> /*
> * Now that the whole userspace is frozen we need to disable
> * the OOM killer to disallow any further interference with
> @@ -149,8 +159,10 @@ int freeze_processes(void)
> if (!error && !oom_killer_disable(msecs_to_jiffies(freeze_timeout_msecs)))
> error = -EBUSY;
>
> - if (error)
> + if (error) {
> + iterate_supers_excl(fs_suspend_thaw_sb, NULL);
> thaw_processes();
> + }
Does this also have the same problem? i.e. if fs_suspend_freeze_sb()
skips over superblocks that are already userspace frozen without any
error, then this will incorrectly thaw those userspace frozen
filesystems.
Cheers,
Dave.
--
Dave Chinner
david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
_______________________________________________
kexec mailing list
kexec@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/kexec
