On 04/13/23 at 03:30pm, Catalin Marinas wrote: > On Thu, Apr 13, 2023 at 03:45:50PM +0800, Baoquan He wrote: > > I am OK with this version, or the version with min(SZ_4G, > > arm64_dma_phys_limit), or v4. Please help point out if I got your idea > > correctly. Thanks a lot. > > I think we should stick to this patch. The disabling of the ZONE_DMA(32) > is fairly specialised and you are right that we should not introduce an > artificial 4GB crashkernel boundary on such systems. The slight > confusion may be that ,high triggers a search above 4GB where there's > not such boundary but this would match the documentation anyway. OK, sounds good to me. Thanks a lot for all those careful reviewing and helpful suggestions. _______________________________________________ kexec mailing list kexec@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/kexec
