On Wed, Jan 25, 2023 at 10:37 AM Matthew Wilcox <willy@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> On Wed, Jan 25, 2023 at 08:49:50AM -0800, Suren Baghdasaryan wrote:
> > On Wed, Jan 25, 2023 at 1:10 AM Peter Zijlstra <peterz@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > > > + /*
> > > > + * Flags, see mm.h.
> > > > + * WARNING! Do not modify directly.
> > > > + * Use {init|reset|set|clear|mod}_vm_flags() functions instead.
> > > > + */
> > > > + unsigned long vm_flags;
> > >
> > > We have __private and ACCESS_PRIVATE() to help with enforcing this.
> >
> > Thanks for pointing this out, Peter! I guess for that I'll need to
> > convert all read accesses and provide get_vm_flags() too? That will
> > cause some additional churt (a quick search shows 801 hits over 248
> > files) but maybe it's worth it? I think Michal suggested that too in
> > another patch. Should I do that while we are at it?
>
> Here's a trick I saw somewhere in the VFS:
>
> union {
> const vm_flags_t vm_flags;
> vm_flags_t __private __vm_flags;
> };
>
> Now it can be read by anybody but written only by those using
> ACCESS_PRIVATE.
Huh, this is quite nice! I think it does not save us from the cases
when vma->vm_flags is passed by a reference and modified indirectly,
like in ksm_madvise()? Though maybe such usecases are so rare (I found
only 2 cases) that we can ignore this?
_______________________________________________
kexec mailing list
kexec@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/kexec
