On 12/07/22 at 11:00am, Borislav Petkov wrote: > On Fri, Nov 25, 2022 at 11:26:53AM +0800, Baoquan He wrote: > > This kernel config CRASH_HOTPLUG is added in patch 7, but we have used > > it in the previous patch, not sure if this is acceptable. > > Why would it not be acceptable? Below is my last reply to Eric about my thinking on this. That would be great if it's a normal situation when adding Kconfig item, I am happy to learn this if it's confirmed normal. ===== Hmm, since it's bisect-able, seems doesn't break rule. I could be too sensitive. Do we have a precendent like this, to strengthen our confidence? If no concern from other people, it's also fine to me. ===== Thanks Baoquan _______________________________________________ kexec mailing list kexec@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/kexec
