Re: [PATCH v13 7/7] x86/crash: add x86 crash hotplug support

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 





On 11/2/22 13:49, Borislav Petkov wrote:
On Wed, Nov 02, 2022 at 11:54:08AM -0500, Eric DeVolder wrote:
Technically the answer is no; cpu hotplug events are independent of memory
hotplug events, but both are written into the elfcorehdr, so in reality
yes... The elfcorehdr contains a single list of Phdrs describing CPUs and
crash memory ranges; the entire list is re-written on a hotplug change.

Then technically also yes. Otherwise your crash information will contain
wrong CPU numbers.

How has that not been a problem until now...?

I.e., offline a bunch of CPUs and then cause a crash dump.

Hmm.


There is a solution for updating the elfcorehdr today, for when say a bunch of CPUs are offlined. It is done via userspace udev rules to do a unload-then-reload of the entire crash kernel system (kernel, initrd, purgatory, boot_params, and of course elfcorehdr). This performs extremely poorly in highly dynamic hotplug situations (such as when adding alot of memory to a vm), and thus the attempt at this solution.

But I sense I missing your point?

Thanks!
eric

_______________________________________________
kexec mailing list
kexec@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/kexec



[Index of Archives]     [LM Sensors]     [Linux Sound]     [ALSA Users]     [ALSA Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Linux Media]     [Kernel]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Media]

  Powered by Linux