On Tue, 2022-08-09 at 16:03 -0300, Guilherme G. Piccoli wrote: > On 09/08/2022 15:09, Johannes Berg wrote: > > [...] > > > > V2: > > > > - Kept the notifier header to avoid implicit usage - thanks > > > > Johannes for the suggestion! > > > > > > > > arch/um/drivers/mconsole_kern.c | 7 +++---- > > > > arch/um/kernel/um_arch.c | 8 ++++---- > > > > 2 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-) > > > > [...] > > > > > > Hi Johannes, do you feel this one is good now, after your last review? > > > Thanks in advance, > > > > > > > Yeah, no objections, my previous comment was just a minor almost style > > issue anyway. > > > > johannes > > Perfect, thank you! Let me take the opportunity to ask you something I'm > asking all the maintainers involved here - do you prefer taking the > patch through your tree, or to get it landed with the whole series, at > once, from some maintainer? > Hm. I don't think we'd really care, but so far I was thinking - since it's a series - it'd go through some appropriate tree all together. If you think it should be applied separately, let us know. johannes _______________________________________________ kexec mailing list kexec@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/kexec
