Re: [PATCH v8 0/4] use more system keyrings to verify arm64 and s390 kexec kernel image signature

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, 2022-06-16 at 09:21 +0800, Coiby Xu wrote:
> Hi Mimi,
> 
> On Thu, Jun 09, 2022 at 11:35:13AM -0400, Mimi Zohar wrote:
> >Hi Coiby,
> >
> >On Fri, 2022-05-27 at 21:43 +0800, Coiby Xu wrote:
> >> It seems I need to only change cover letter and commit message i.e.
> >> there is no concern about the code. So it's better to provide a
> >> new cover letter here to collect new feedback from you thus we
> >> can avoid unnecessary rounds of patch set.
> >
> >One other thing before re-posting, the existing Subject line is a bit
> >snarky.  Perhaps you could come with a more appropriate title?
> 
> How about "Using the same keyrings as x86 to verify kexec'ed kernel image
> signature for arm64 and s390" or "Uniform keyrings to verify kexec'ed
> kernel image signature across x86, arm64 and s390"?

Instead of using "Uniform", I would use the verb form "Unify".

Mimi
 


_______________________________________________
kexec mailing list
kexec@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/kexec



[Index of Archives]     [LM Sensors]     [Linux Sound]     [ALSA Users]     [ALSA Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Linux Media]     [Kernel]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Media]

  Powered by Linux